| Political Pop-ups, and Follow the
Money | Log
in/Create an Account | Top | 380 comments | Search Discussion |
|
|
| The Fine Print: The following comments are owned
by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any
way. |
| (1) | 2
|
Pop ups (Score:5, Insightful)
by krymsin01 (700838)
<`pemdasi'
`at' `cox.net'> on Monday March 29, @06:10AM (#8701487)
(http://members.cox.net/pemdasi
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~krymsin01/journal/)
|
| So instead of using the Internet to rally and energize the
American public into voting for them, they are going to use it
to furthor alienate and annoy us with pop-ups? Are they that
out of touch that they believe pop-ups are actualy going to
give them some sort of edge? |
|
|
Re:Pop ups (Score:4, Interesting)
by TomV
(138637) on Monday March 29, @06:56AM (#8701674)
|
| or: As well as using the internet to rally and energise
the American Public into voting for them, they are going to
use it to further alienate and annoy everyone outside the US
without a vote in the US elections with pop-ups? Are they that
out of touch that they believe these pop-ups are actually
going to be limited to US voters only? |
Seriously.... (Score:3, Interesting)
by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 29, @08:23AM
(#8701954)
|
you think either the Republicans or Democrats are that
concerned about where the money comes from.
Now that's
optimistic! If you've got a prostitution ring in Thailand that
specializes in the anal rape of baby monk seals, you just have
to launder the money before you buy the
politician.
Randomly enough. They admit this is an
experiment and they don't know what they're doing, but they've
got, and I shit you not, so much money, that it makes it a
perfect time to run the experiment. That's their actual, said
it to the camera, position. It doesn't matter how much they
piss people off, they've got enough extra money to fix
it.
But I'd check the outrage if I were a European. The
Republicans couldn't by a better publicist than the EU.
Remember, if you look like you hate America, anything that
pisses you off looks like a good idea. If you want Ohio and
it's electoral votes to go to the red team in November, keep
it up. |
Re:Pop ups (Score:4, Interesting)
by blazerw11 (68928)
<.blazerw. .at.
.bigfoot.com.> on Monday March 29, @10:26AM (#8702645)
(http://www.1702.org/)
|
Republicans don't care about people outside the U.S. Have
you not been paying attention?!
:)
The above was meant to be humorous
toward the parent poster and a slight slam against our
conservative leadership, which, if I may make an intelligent
argument here, suck.
|
Re:Conspiracy? (Score:2) by
cayenne8 (626475)
on Monday March 29, @02:40PM (#8705765)
(http://www.outpimp.com/?x=57020)
|
| Hmm....so THAT's why the Bush people let MS off so easily,
they wanted to keep people using IE...so, that people could
not easily block their pop-up ads...
Yeah...it all makes sense now...
See, a good Slashdot article..conspiracy, bashing MS, and a
shot at the Republicans...
:-) |
Re:Pop ups (Score:3, Interesting)
by Cally
(10873) on Monday March 29, @08:08AM (#8701884)
(http://www.zpok.demon.co.uk/)
|
| I'm really looking forward to the first one of these I
see, when I shall send a lengthy email of complaint about how
I'm unable to vote in the election, not being American.
Hopefully that'll suck up a few minutes of time of some
campaign worker and help drain away the Bush funds. Just doin'
my bit... |
Re:Pop ups (Score:2, Insightful)
by WindowlessView
(703773) on Monday March 29, @10:00AM (#8702445)
|
|
-->Hopefully that'll suck up a few minutes of time of
some campaign worker
It will suck up the .003 seconds of
computer time that it takes to strip your info off the email
header, send out a form letter, and put you in a database so
you can be harassed by American politicians until the end of
time. |
Re:Pop ups (Score:1, Troll)
by Cally
(10873) on Monday March 29, @11:19AM (#8703239)
(http://www.zpok.demon.co.uk/)
|
| OK, I'm game - we'll see who can waste more of who's time.
Hint: there are five and half billion-odd of us and only
250-something million of you. Why should my valuable time be
consumed by fuckheaded US politicos that personally I'd be
happy to see burnt at the stake? |
Re:Pop ups (Score:2) by Rick Zeman
(15628) on Monday March 29, @01:14PM (#8704584)
|
OK, I'm game - we'll see who can waste more of who's
time. Hint: there are five and half billion-odd of us and only
250-something million of you. Why should my valuable time be
consumed by fuckheaded US politicos that personally I'd be
happy to see burnt at the stake?
Fine--the
solution then is to stay away from any fuckheaded US web
sites, right? |
Re:Pop ups (Score:1) by mcocke (710952) <cocke@catherders.com>
on Monday March 29, @08:14AM (#8701911)
(http://www.catherders.com/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~mcocke/journal/)
|
Anyone not using privoxy, mozilla, or similar to filter
pop-up/unders get what they deserve. If you don't vote, you
don't get to complain. Vote "NO" to pop-ups/unders!
|
Vote Republican (Score:5, Funny)
by Rogerborg (306625)
on Monday March 29, @08:18AM (#8701927)
(http://slashdot.org/)
|
| If you want us to stop. |
Just hope they don't do it in Switzerland,
too... (Score:5, Interesting) by DrYak (748999) on Monday
March 29, @08:54AM (#8702062)
|
Alienating the Americans ? How about alienating the Swiss
? Each couple of month, in Switzerland we're supposed to
vote about a dozen of laws, laws change and other
subjects. Just imagine the desktop mess if swiss politician
start to make pop-up like the american : not just two pop-ups
for two candidate, but dozens of pop-ups about pro and cons
for each subjet. Now THAT'S going to make a big wreckage on
the desktop ! I think people will start to hate democracy...
or make Mozilla the official nationnal browser for it's
ad-blocking... |
Re:Just hope they don't do it in Switzerland,
too. (Score:2) by WindBourne (631190)
on Monday March 29, @09:55AM (#8702396)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~WindBourne/journal/)
|
| But on the plus side, this may actually help spread laws
and ideas. While I will almost certainly dispise the american
politicians that do this, I will probably read the swiss stuff
and think about it. Well, probably only for the first time.
|
Swiss law is open-source, kind-of...
(Score:2, Interesting) by DrYak (748999) on Monday
March 29, @10:32AM (#8702702)
|
|
I will probably read the swiss stuff and think about
it
In a way swiss law are open source : at least the voting
document always come with the exact text of the law you're
going to vote for. Same can't be said about amercan
politicians
|
Re:Swiss law is open-source,
kind-of... (Score:1) by Steveftoth (78419)
on Monday March 29, @02:19PM (#8705412)
(http://slashdot.org/)
|
They send the laws that you are voting on to you in the
mail before hand. At least if you are a registered
voter.
They don't give you a copy when you vote that's
true.
How many people would read them anyways? Why
don't we require there to be television shows that just state
the actual text of the laws instead of having people talk
about their opinions? |
Re:Just hope they don't do it in Switzerland,
too. (Score:2) by k98sven (324383) on
Monday March 29, @04:35PM (#8707152)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~k98sven/journal/)
|
Hey! Some of us do try to follow the Swiss
referendums.
How did that one on the carrier-pigeons
back in 1996 end?
I kind of forgot to follow-up that
one.
|
They are sponsoring pop-up for their
*opponents*! (Score:3, Funny) by ArsenneLupin
(766289) on Monday March 29, @09:17AM (#8702159)
|
| they are going to use it to furthor alienate and annoy
us with pop-ups?
That's the point. They are sending pop-ups for their
opponents, stupid! |
Re:They are sponsoring pop-up for their
*opponents (Score:1) by InvaderSkooge
(615857) on Monday March 29, @06:42PM (#8708492)
(http://www.livejournal.com/~notapipe
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~InvaderSkooge/journal/)
|
| A new, low-cost internet version of the 4 AM
robocalling of New Hampshire voters supposedly by the Dean
campaign [dailykos.com]? |
Re:Pop ups (Score:2) by stry_cat (558859) on
Monday March 29, @09:31AM (#8702229)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~stry_cat/journal/)
|
If popups didn't work they wouldn't be used.
While
they'll alinate the /. group the average
AOLuser is going to say "Oh they care enough about me to
advertise here, I love Dubbya. I will vote for him so he and
and his big government socalist friends can keep me safe from
those nasty slashdotter terrorists"
|
Re:Pop ups (Score:2) by Joey7F (307495) on
Monday March 29, @06:27PM (#8708345)
(http://compustore.com/ |
Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Joey7F/journal/)
|
Dubbya has "big government socialist
friends"?
--Joye |
Re:Pop ups (Score:1) by True Grit (739797)
<[moc.poptoh]
[ta] [nrubgocde]> on Tuesday March 30, @04:28AM (#8712053)
|
Sure, they aren't the same as the Democrat's "big
socialist friends", but they like to spend our money just the
same, only on different things.
|
It Gets Better (Score:1) by
John Blake
(766336) on Monday March 29, @09:44AM (#8702301)
|
| Oh Yes of course, Once they get "Everyone" Internet then
they will be able to "control" the internet. |
Re:Pop ups (Score:2) by DaedalusLogic
(449896) on Monday March 29, @01:13PM (#8704572)
|
| I don't think this is as bad as bloodforoil.org sending me
spam. Which I have gotten numerous e-mails from today. Pop
ups, while a bad marketing decision are paid for placement
advertising. They're probably on sights like foxnews.com that
has a conservative audience that will repsond to them. Blood
for Oil is indescriminately spewing out full color images that
fill the screen of most viewers when opened. I personally
believe their political views are misguided, and now know
their technology use is even more misguided. |
Yay! (Score:5, Funny) by ColourlessGreenIdeas
(711076) on Monday March 29, @06:10AM (#8701488)
|
| An oppertunity for the republicans to annoy everyone.
That's what I like to see. |
|
|
Re:Yay! (Score:2) by Jeremiah
Cornelius (137) on Monday March 29, @06:22AM (#8701532)
(http://www.memepool.com/ |
Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Jeremiah%20Cornelius/journal/)
|
| Spammers for Bush! Surefire way to become as populatr with
the public as, say, X-10! |
California's Bill Jones Spammed last
time (Score:5, Informative) by billstewart
(78916) on Monday March 29, @06:55AM (#8701670)
(http://idiom.com/~wcs | Last
Journal: http://slashdot.org/~billstewart/journal/)
|
Bill Jones
[jonesforcalifornia.com] is a California Republican who's
running for Senate this year against Barbara Boxer. Back in
2002, when he was Secretary of State and trying to get the
Republican nomination to run for governor (Bill Simon beat
him, and lost to Gray Davis, who was later recalled and
replaced by Ahnold), his campaign sent out a bunch of email
spam, and got spanked by the net.
So here in California, the Republicans already have lots of
practice annoying Internet users. Let's hope they keep it up!
|
Re:Yay! (Score:2) by robbyjo (315601) on
Monday March 29, @06:22AM (#8701533)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last
Journal: http://slashdot.org/~robbyjo/journal/)
|
|
Well, let's wait a while... if it makes them unpopular,
they'll stop it for sure. They can't afford losing their
supporters. I guess they're just experimenting on a new idea,
just like sending spam is. I personally never received their
spam yet, but some people actually welcomed it. Unsure about
the pop-up ads though.
|
*groan! (Score:4, Funny) by
manavendra
(688020) <manavendrak&hotmail,com>
on Monday March 29, @06:12AM (#8701494)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~manavendra/journal/)
|
As if pr0n pop-ups werent enough, we'll now have Dubya and
others popping up and asking to vote for them. Wonder if
the internet usage policy will classify Dubya with his silly
grin as "distasteful, objectionable content"
:-) |
|
|
Republican Popups Taking Over Your
Screen (Score:5, Funny) by billstewart
(78916) on Monday March 29, @06:45AM (#8701627)
(http://idiom.com/~wcs | Last
Journal: http://slashdot.org/~billstewart/journal/)
|
| Single popups are bad enough, but just wait until the
Republicans try those rapid-fire take-over-your-screen
can't-hit-the-X-fast-enough popups. "Terrorists might be
hiding under your bed!" "Democrats are Liberal Liberal
Liberal!" "Weapons of Mass Destruction!" "Our
Enemies are EEEEVILLLLL!" "Yellow Alert No,
Orange Alert! No, Yellow Alert!" "Pink Alert -
Gay People Might Destroy Your Marriage Unless You let Us
Repeal The Constitution!" "Don't Vote Democrat or
Terrorists Will Squish This Hamster!" "Be Afraid, Be
Very Afraid!" "Don't Worry, Republicans Will Protect You!"
"Pay No Attention to the Web Bug Behind This Window!"
"CLick the Dancing Osama To Fight Terrorism!" "Click
the Dancing Osama to Vote Republican!" "If you Don't
see the Fnords, they won't eat you!" "Homeland Security
works if We All Cooperate!" |
Re:Republican Popups Taking Over Your
Screen (Score:1, Troll) by b-baggins (610215)
on Monday March 29, @11:30AM (#8703378)
|
| And then a bomb goes off and kills 200 people on a train
in Madrid and people realize just what an ass folks like you
really are. |
repeatatron (Score:2) by Doc Ruby (173196)
on Monday March 29, @12:18PM (#8703945)
(http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal/)
|
| And then someone uses the word "folks" to mean "enemies"
and people realize that you're a Republican repeatatron. When
al Qaeda bombs a capital, and that government hijacks the
backlash to attack a preferred enemy instead, Spanish folks
take back their government to ensure security. In November,
American folks will do the same. |
Re:repeatatron (Score:1) by
Ktulu_03 (668300)
on Monday March 29, @12:41PM (#8704227)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Ktulu_03/journal/)
|
Yes, because the terrorists are really going to stop
bombing attacks because President Bush is out of office. yep.
that makes sense.
Wake up people. The terrorists are
against western civilization, and they aren't going to stop
just because we elect some peacenik president. |
Re:repeatatron (Score:3, Insightful)
by Doc
Ruby (173196) on Monday March 29, @12:53PM (#8704351)
(http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal/)
|
| Al Qaeda will be stopped more effectively when the
President is focused on them, uninhibited by Saudi sponsors,
and sensible enough not to kick the hornets nest for his
hidden agenda. If you think that Kerry, a Silver Star winning
Vietnam vet, is a "peacenik", then you understand war, and
peace, as poorly as you understand terrorism. Ask a frontline
veteran sometime about peace - that'll wake you up.
|
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
b-baggins
(610215) on Monday March 29, @02:33PM (#8705652)
|
Appeasers feed the crocodile, hoping he will eat them
last.
-- Winston Churchill |
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
Doc Ruby
(173196) on Monday March 29, @02:41PM (#8705781)
(http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal/)
|
| Republicans fed Saddam. Fed bin Laden. Feed Bush at your
peril. Who exactly is being appeased, by whom? |
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
mi (197448) <mi+slashdot@aldan.algebra.com>
on Monday March 29, @07:49PM (#8709151)
|
|
Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats (Clinton) fed
Saddam nor bin Laden in order to appease them. Whatever their
reasons were, appeasement was not one of them. So your
counterargument is wrong and without merit. |
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
mi (197448) <mi+slashdot@aldan.algebra.com>
on Monday March 29, @03:10PM (#8706164)
|
that government hijacks the backlash to attack a
preferred enemy instead
Aznar did not do that. With what little was known then, ETA
may well have been behind the attack. He promised a thorough
investigation. Contrast that with Putin's reaction to
explosions in Moscow subway: "We know, it is
the Chechens," -- he said -- "There is nothing to
investigate." He got 72% of the vote soon
afterwards...
Spanish folks take back their government to
ensure security.
The reaction of Spanish electorate to the carefully timed
attack in Madrid has reminded the world, how dangerous the
"government by referendum" is. Without the "checks and
balances" of some sort, a democracy is just as prone to the
irrational greed, stupidity, cowardice, and other human flaws
as, say, a monarchy.
The first well known example of this is Socrate's
conviction in the democratic Athens...
In November, American folks will do the
same.
I just hope, Al'Qaeda will not succeed in bombing US right
before the elections, the way they succeeded in Madrid...
|
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
Doc Ruby
(173196) on Monday March 29, @03:36PM (#8706504)
(http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal/)
|
| Your unabashed hatred of democracy invalidates your
attempts to compare naive Russians with sophisticated
Spaniards in their exercise of their democratic rights. And
stop calling Americans "folks" - we know you warmongers use it
as a term of contempt. Like when BushCo manufactures another
terrorist event, by refocusing on some other neocon agenda
instead, and try whip the American electorate into a mad
frenzy to attack "the folks whut did it". I can only hope
Americans are as perceptive as the Spanish, rather than the
Russians, although you apparently do not. |
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
mi (197448) <mi+slashdot@aldan.algebra.com>
on Monday March 29, @07:44PM (#8709104)
|
|
Wow! What energy! I can just see your saliva hitting your
monitor...
I don't "hate" democracy -- I merely suggested, it needs
"the checks and balances," as, for example, the US model
provided since US' very inception.
And I never called Americans "folks" (not that there is
anything wrong with it, IMO) -- your vision must be impaired
-- pull whatever it is out and relax. "Mad as hell" has been
out of fashion for well over a month now :-)
And when you cool down a little (assuming it happens within
a few days), please, describe a single
terrorist event, that did not really happen, but was
"manufactured by BushCo". Put up, or shut up? |
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
Doc Ruby
(173196) on Monday March 29, @08:17PM (#8709392)
(http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal/)
|
| As we find out for certain every time a Bush veteran finds
their conscience in this Republican utopia, the WTC/Pentagon
planebombings were manufactured by deprioritizing al Qaeda
despite the utmost warnings from experts, inside and outside
both the previous and current administrations. That's no
accident - that's willful ignorance, to reap the sick harvest
of the "Pearl Harbor event" desired in published blueprints
from the Project for a New American Century. If that doesn't
make you mad, I suppose it's explained by a corollary to
"there's none so blind as those who will not see": there's
none so numb as those who will not feel. I guess that's the
only way to remain partisan in face of the mountain of
evidence of BushCo evildoing, but you're serving a thankless
master at the expense of your country, and your own personal
safety. |
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
Doc Ruby
(173196) on Monday March 29, @11:55PM (#8710795)
(http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal/)
|
Blame Canada for their leftwing conspiracy theories about
PNAC
blueprints for a "new Pearl Harbor"
[www.cbc.ca].
BTW, Lieberman's a "Democrat" just to the
left of Zell(out) Miller. It is sad that the country has come
to that. |
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
mi (197448) <mi+slashdot@aldan.algebra.com>
on Tuesday March 30, @08:58AM (#8712801)
|
|
WTC/Pentagon planebombing happened 9 months after Bush took
office, after 8 years of Clinton's presidency. From what we
already know about this attack, preparing it took much longer
than 9 month.
You accused "BushCo" of manufacturing the
attacks. I asked for evidence, and this is
all you can come up with? The "mountain of evidence" is in
your mind only, once you try to convey it, it turns into a
mole-hill. One can hardly get more partisan than you, that's
for sure... |
Re:repeatatron (Score:2) by
Doc Ruby
(173196) on Monday April 05, @04:29AM (#8767070)
(http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Doc%20Ruby/journal/)
|
I cited the PNAC blueprint. But I guessed right about your
willful blindness - you'll never read it, or admit it steers
our country, and our world, into the inferno.
What a
week for the power of the truth - your boys (and the
occasional girl, like Rice) are sinking fast, with Clarke's
book a mountain the size of the Titanic's iceberg. Any
rebuttal to the man set by Rice and Bush as crisis manager
when the planebombs finally hit? I am party to truth, justice,
and the American Way of liberty - and a registered voter with
party affiliation of "none of your business". You rightwingers
goosestep to the BushCo rhumba, chanting "partisan" whenever
your agenda is threatened, even by Republican insiders like
Clarke, O'Neil, Lindsey, Whitman, and everyone else with a
shred of dignity fleeing your sinking ship before it drowns us
all. |
Re:Republican Popups Taking Over Your
Screen (Score:2) by RobinH (124750) on
Monday March 29, @11:23PM (#8710602)
(http://slashdot.org/)
|
And then a bomb goes off and kills 200 people on a
train in Madrid and people realize just what an ass folks like
you really are.
Buddy, you're an American and a
republican... as if you know where Madrid is!
|
you CAN hit the X fast enough
(Score:2) by SanityInAnarchy
(655584) on Monday March 29, @03:34PM (#8706471)
|
Aside from popup-blocking browsers, the thing to realize
is that most often, they won't open 15 million popups, they'll
open one or two for every one that you close.
This is
just the last time I checked, of course. Now I use firefox on
Linux, so I have no real knowledge of viruses or popups -- I
just don't get them. |
more *groan! (Score:5, Funny)
by spellraiser
(764337) on Monday March 29, @07:04AM (#8701693)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~spellraiser/journal/)
|
|
Pop-up and pop-under ads of any variety haven't been
around long ... ???
They've been around TOO long. More specifically, they have
been around, period. |
Could be worse (Score:1) by
Phekko (619272) on
Monday March 29, @07:08AM (#8701707)
|
| Imagine a NUDE Dubya pop-up ;) |
Re:Could be worse (Score:1)
by manavendra (688020)
<manavendrak&hotmail,com>
on Monday March 29, @07:26AM (#8701757)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~manavendra/journal/)
|
| Oh hell no! that would be laughing matter!
:- |
Re:Could be worse (Score:2)
by csteinle
(68146) on Monday March 29, @08:16AM (#8701920)
(http://www.death-star.blueyonder.co.uk/)
|
| I thought I couldn't, but now I have. And it's your fault.
I'm going to hunt you down and make you pay for making me come
up with that image. |
Re:*groan! (Score:3, Funny)
by WWWWolf
(2428) <wwwwolf@iki.fi> on Monday
March 29, @07:29AM (#8701768)
(http://www.iki.fi/wwwwolf/)
|
Wonder if the internet usage policy will
classify Dubya with his silly grin as "distasteful,
objectionable content" :-)
According to some porn
filters [dansdata.com], yes, pictures of GWB are vile
pornography. =) |
Re:*groan! (Score:2) by Lumpy (12016) on Monday
March 29, @09:15AM (#8702153)
(http://www.your-website-sucks.com/)
|
Although last election I found these test pop-up's quite
entertaining...
Gore
Vs Bush [jibjab.com]
|
Re:*groan! (Score:1) by CreatureComfort
(741652) * on
Monday March 29, @12:35PM (#8704166)
|
Worse yet... a Bush (as in President) pop-up appearing
right next to a bush (as in sexy teen virgins) pop-up from the
same website. Seeing those two pictures side by side could
give you definate sexual dysfunction.
|
Oh bloody hell (Score:5, Funny)
by NemesisStar
(619232) on Monday March 29, @06:13AM (#8701496)
|
If this means I get "Vote for Bush" popups in Australia
I'm going to be very upset.
I'd prefer a 12" penis any
day! |
|
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:4,
Interesting) by meringuoid (568297)
on Monday March 29, @06:16AM (#8701507)
|
| Well, the annoying thing is... whoever wins this election
will be deciding what my country's foreign policy is going to
be. Yet I don't get a vote in it. Isn't it great living in a
vassal state?
And now, just to rub it in, they're going to pop up their
campaign ads at me. Brilliant. |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:2,
Insightful) by Trailwalker
(648636) on Monday March 29, @06:37AM (#8701595)
|
..living in a vassal
state?
Don't get too excited by this, we
have fifty of them here. |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:2)
by SillyNickName4me
(760022) on Monday March 29, @07:31AM (#8701773)
(http://www.bartsplace.net/)
|
> Don't get too excited by this, we have fifty of them
here.
Except for the fact that the peopel livign in
those 50 can still vote.. not that it really makes a
difference this time.. (hmm. come to think of it, it didn't
matter much last time either)
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:2)
by ross.w
(87751) <wonderleys
AT spin DOT net DOT au> on Monday March 29, @11:53PM
(#8710786)
(http://rossw.freeshell.org/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~ross.w/journal/)
|
| Unless you live in FLorida, and your name is Chad...
Wasn't that how it went? |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1)
by sanctimonius
hypocrt (235536) on Monday March 29, @08:56AM (#8702071)
(http://harrist.freeshell.org/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~sanctimonius%20hypocrt/journal/)
|
Yet I don't get a vote in it. Isn't it great living
in a vassal state?
Next you`ll be griping about taxation without
representation.
If you don`t like how the government in Brussels treats
you, get out.
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:3,
Informative) by kiwimate (458274) on
Monday March 29, @10:40AM (#8702765)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~kiwimate/journal/)
|
Next you`ll be griping about taxation without
representation.
What, you mean like Washington
D.C.? From the pages of the first site [dcvote.org] that
popped up when I googled:
District of Columbia
citizens have no representation of any kind in the US Senate
and only a nonvoting delegate to the US House of
Representatives. US citizens who live in Washington, DC, have
no voting representation on the national issues considered by
Congress. Furthermore, since Congress also acts as
Washington's "state" legislature, local citizens are also
denied voting representation in a state legislative
body-something that all other Americans enjoy.
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:2)
by mgs1000
(583340) on Monday March 29, @10:56AM (#8702964)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~mgs1000/journal/)
|
| Not that anybody actually wants to live in D.C. anyway...
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1)
by sanctimonius
hypocrt (235536) on Monday March 29, @11:42AM (#8703529)
(http://harrist.freeshell.org/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~sanctimonius%20hypocrt/journal/)
|
...taxation without representation.
What, you mean like Washington D.C.?
Yes, entirely like that. If the people of D.C. want greater
voting rights, let them fight and take them, not whine to be
given them.
If the people of Europe want to control their own destiny,
let them establish, maintain, and pay a military force that
will allow that.
What I`m unwilling to do is maintain an army and allow
someone else to dictate its use.
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1)
by highwindarea
(732127) on Monday March 29, @09:19AM (#8702169)
|
| The worst part is I've read your comment several times and
still can't guess what country you're from. |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:2)
by surprise_audit
(575743) on Monday March 29, @11:19AM (#8703238)
|
Oh bloody hell
That's mostly a British expression, but of course it would
have spread over most of the inhabitable planet (and Canada)
back in the days of the British Empire, so I can see your
problem... :) |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1, Offtopic)
by Aneurysm9 (723000)
on Monday March 29, @06:34AM (#8701580)
|
| you mean you wouldn't rather have a 5'+ dick? |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1, Offtopic)
by Sj0
(472011) on Monday March 29, @07:07AM (#8701704)
(http://powerusr.sphosting.com/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Sj0/journal/)
|
| Or a +5 longsword of babemagnitism? ;)
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1)
by Nighttime (231023)
on Monday March 29, @06:34AM (#8701581)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last
Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Nighttime/journal/)
|
If this means I get "Vote for Bush" popups in Australia
I'm going to be very upset.
Seems that they don't
realise that the first two double-ewes stand for world-wide.
Is there any way that the web server can tell which country
the request is coming from and not display the ad?
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:3,
Informative) by Dave2 Wickham
(600202) *
<dave@allaboutgames.co.uk>
on Monday March 29, @06:56AM (#8701672)
(http://www.allaboutgames.co.uk/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Dave2%20Wickham/journal/)
|
| Many ad companies already do use location targetted ads -
I often see Sainsbury's, Switch etc ads on US sites. Of course
this isn't 100% foolproof, but it did even work with my old
(pre-RIPE) IP. |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:2,
Informative) by Matthias
Wiesmann (221411) on Monday March 29, @07:36AM (#8701786)
(http://lsewww.epfl.ch/wiesmann/)
|
Many ad companies already do use location
targetted ads - I often see Sainsbury's, Switch etc ads on
US sites. Of course this isn't 100% foolproof, but it did
even work with my old (pre-RIPE) IP. In my
experience this is quite random. In my case (I'm Swiss), I get
quite a variety of adds, beside the one for the US, I get some
for France and some for Germany, nothing for Italy yet
(Italian is the third langage spoken in Switzerland). At least
I seem not to get proposals to move my money to a Swiss bank
account anymore...
I suspect the system used to select adds is quite
primitive, and I'm simply too strange a case to get tailored
adds. |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:2)
by DunbarTheInept
(764) on Monday March 29, @03:53PM (#8706699)
(http://slashdot.org/)
|
The problem is that the U.S. doesn't have it's own top
level domain that gets used much. You see lots of sites ending
in .uk, or .fr, or
.au, and so on, but not a whole lot ending
in .us - instead the US sites just use the
main original heirarchy of .com,
.org, .net,
.edu, and so on - which unfortunately a lot of
other countries also use. There is no guarantee that a non-usa
site will end in a country TLD, and so no guarantee that
a .com or .org address is
or is not in the US.
|
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1)
by Andux
(260446) <andux AT
bigfoot DOT com> on Monday March 29, @05:27PM (#8707750)
(http://meepo.dnsalias.org/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Andux/journal/)
|
| No problem. Just look up the IP on ARIN [arin.net]. If they
tell you to look it up on RIPE/APNIC/whoever, it's from
overseas; otherwise, it's generally from the US. |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:5, Funny)
by Surlyboi
(96917) on Monday March 29, @07:04AM (#8701695)
(http://surlyboi.net/ | Last
Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Surlyboi/journal/)
|
| You're in luck then, because if you vote Bush, you get
Dick for free! |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1)
by WyldDot
(726567) on Monday March 29, @08:13AM (#8701905)
|
| how about a 12" pop-up? :) |
Re:Oh bloody hell (Score:1)
by Rick
Zeman (15628) on Monday March 29, @01:17PM (#8704625)
|
If this means I get "Vote for Bush" popups in Australia
I'm going to be very upset.
I'd prefer a 12" penis any
day!
Ouch. |
NO DIFF (Score:1) by quarkscat (697644)
on Monday March 29, @01:38PM (#8704868)
|
It has become increasingly evident that there needs to
be either (1) restrictions on the issuing of Viagra
(et.al.) to politicians, or (2) a combined FDA/Nat. Academy
of Science study on the impact of loss of blood flow on
the mental facilities (and party agenda). (double entendre
intended)
Ques) At what point during Senator
Dole's presidential campaign against Bill Clinton in
1992 did he effectively lose interest? Ans) When he got his
1st Viagra prescription (ed. note: Dole later became the
USA poster child for "Viagra For
Politicians")
Ques) At what point did Alan Greenspan
(Fed. Reserve) lose his financial acumen? Ans) When he
married a babe 40 years his junior, and needed that Viagra
prescription.
A proper formal investigation may well
determine that it is not in America's best interests
for ANY politician to make new laws in any period less
that 72 hours AFTER taking Viagra.
|
Re:NO DIFF (Score:1) by jnicholson (733344)
on Monday March 29, @11:51PM (#8710770)
(http://www.tvondvd.net/)
|
A proper formal investigation may well
determine that it is not in America's best interests for ANY
politician to make new laws in any period less that 72 hours
AFTER taking Viagra. I can just see the
warning label...
WARNING: As long as you are feeling drowsy or dizzy, do not
drive, use machines, pass laws, or do anything else that could
be dangerous if you are dizzy or are not alert.
|
MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:2, Interesting) by
Anonymous Coward on Monday March 29, @06:16AM (#8701508)
|
The intro to this article mentions Opera and Mozilla -
forget it, there's much better out there. I've tried every
browser out there, and for nearly 6 months now I've used
MyIE2. It "takes over" IE2 and runs as a seperate program -
not only does it do pop-up blocking, it also does _content_
blocking. My eyes are open, the internet (and slashdot) no
longer has ads - try it, try it, try it (if you're stuck in
Windows).
Freeware. http://www.myie2.com |
|
|
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:1, Informative) by
Anonymous Coward on Monday March 29, @06:21AM (#8701529)
|
| Alternatively, you could just download the Google
toolbar... No popups in IE... Sorted. |
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:4, Insightful) by linuxci (3530) on
Monday March 29, @06:25AM (#8701539)
(http://www.mozilla.org/)
|
Why would you want to do that when you can get the cross
platform Firefox that doesn't have the inbuilt holes that
anything that embeds IE has.
Also IMO Firefox has a
nicer interface.
Note: MyIE2 does also support the
Gecko engine in recent versions but enabling it isn't obvious
and there's a few bugs in the integration. |
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:1) by AndrewHowe (60826)
<andrew&confounding-factor,com>
on Monday March 29, @06:33AM (#8701577)
(http://www.confounding-factor.com/)
|
I downloaded Firefox, hmm it was OK, not too bad looking
and the type-ahead find was cute. Unfortunately, when I
tried to download new themes I found out that it's buggy. If
you try to download more than one thing, it says it's finished
as soon as you click on the second thing. Then after a while
it crashes. Not my idea of a "nicer interface"... |
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:4, Informative) by SenseiLeNoir
(699164) on Monday March 29, @07:30AM (#8701770)
|
yes its a bug... but then again, FireFox is not YET
v1.0
If you download an extension/theme, you have to
immeadiately restart the browser to clear the install
queue.
Otherwise when you download the next one, you
will get *TWO" restart messages (and increasing each
time)
This bug WILL be fixed by 1.0, and is hardly what
you call serious, and better by far than IE, which requires to
you restart the system at times. |
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:2, Informative) by Lehk228 (705449) on
Monday March 29, @08:35AM (#8702001)
|
| That wasn't FUD, I USED IE and it actually did behave that
way at times (Having IE explode and take down the 9x kernel
was always fun, especially when doing homework/essays)
fortunately the NT/2k/XP kernel is significantly better
armored than the 9x kernel but IE does still Explode sometimes
and when it does it has a habit of leaving messy pieces all
over. |
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:2) by SillyNickName4me
(760022) on Monday March 29, @07:42AM (#8701796)
(http://www.bartsplace.net/)
|
Hmm, interesting... you'd think that bug would be easy to
reproduce.. yet its not, at least not on the firefox I'm usign
here..
|
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:2) by SillyNickName4me
(760022) on Monday March 29, @07:55AM (#8701846)
(http://www.bartsplace.net/)
|
I'm not implying you are lying, I am implying that it is a
bug that should not be hard to spot, and it surprises me. Bugs
in OSS software are entirely possible
;)
|
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:3, Informative) by Slack3r78 (596506)
on Monday March 29, @06:30AM (#8701564)
(http://www.chaotic-design.com/)
|
It's probably worth noting that IE will do popup blocking
itself beginning with SP2. Microsoft has already released SP2
RC1 [microsoft.com] for public download, for those of you
that like to live on the edge. In addition, it upgrades the
Windows Firewall to what I think of as a ZoneAlarm lite, which
isn't half bad considering it's a freebie for windows
users.
I'll personally stick to Firefox, but in the few
days I've been running the SP2 RC1 on my windows box, I have
to say I'm impressed, and it's a step in the right direction.
|
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:5, Insightful) by mandalayx (674042)
*
<burma@@@berkeley...edu>
on Monday March 29, @06:36AM (#8701591)
(http://www.ralphlee.com/ |
Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~mandalayx/journal/)
|
The intro to this article mentions Opera and
Mozilla - forget it, there's much better out there. I've
tried every browser out there, and for nearly 6 months now
I've used MyIE2. It "takes over" IE2 and runs as a seperate
program - not only does it do pop-up blocking, it also does
_content_ blocking. My eyes are open, the internet (and
slashdot) no longer has ads - try it, try it, try it (if
you're stuck in Windows).
You do
realize, right, that the point of using Mozilla Firefox is not
just popup blocking. In fact, it's going to be hard to market
Firefox on the aspect of pop-up blocking when you have options
like you mentioned and the Google toolbar.
For me, the
point of using Firefox is having a browser that I don't need
to worry about. When I use IE, I'm not sure whether the next
link will take me to an exploit. Or some annoying script. I
don't really have that worry with Firefox....not yet.. |
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:2) by Sj0 (472011) on Monday
March 29, @07:11AM (#8701713)
(http://powerusr.sphosting.com/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Sj0/journal/)
|
| You people are funny. Probably because you use gator. ^ ^
|
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:2) by Sj0 (472011) on Monday
March 29, @07:49AM (#8701817)
(http://powerusr.sphosting.com/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~Sj0/journal/)
|
| Slashdot is such a happy place. ^ ^ |
block ads with a hosts file (Score:3,
Informative) by gad_zuki! (70830) on
Monday March 29, @06:58AM (#8701678)
(http://everythingisnt.com/
| Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~gad_zuki!/journal/)
|
| Very, very
simple to do [everythingisnt.com] and if you must use IE,
just get the google toolbar for pop-up blocking. |
Re:MyIE2 is pop-up blocking & content
blocking (Score:3, Informative) by Lumpy (12016) on Monday
March 29, @09:19AM (#8702174)
(http://www.your-website-sucks.com/)
|
Internet junkbuster does this also for EVERY COMPUTER IN
YOUR HOUSE or office. even better if you have a linux machine
available.. use privoxy
[sourceforge.net]
easier, faster and you can issue
rules to all broswers instantly |
Let Me Guess... (Score:3, Funny)
by illuminata (668963)
on Monday March 29, @06:19AM (#8701519)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~illuminata/journal/)
|
Soon, we'll find that John F. Kerry tries to counter this
with 30 second flash intros. Listen to that thumping techno
beat and kick ass effects!
Oh, what about Nader, you
ask? He won't use computers. Apparently they pollute or
something. He wants monitors banned because of their adverse
health effects, too. But, his rumbling will be heard across
the world anyways, so don't you worry! |
|
|
DMCA (Score:4, Insightful)
by epcraig
(102626) on Monday March 29, @07:17AM (#8701731)
|
| Vote for Kerry, vote for the DMCA.
Vote for Bush, vote for the DMCA.
Nader ran against the DMCA in 2000, I can't see why he'd
change his mind in 2004.
Kucinich, too, ran against the DMCA. Pity nobody cared.
|
Re:DMCA (Score:2) by droleary (47999) on
Monday March 29, @08:10AM (#8701892)
(http://www.subsume.com/employees/droleary/index.html)
|
|
. . . DMCA . . . DMCA . . . DMCA . . . DMCA . . .
The only thing worse than the two-party system is all the
one-issue voters. |
Re:DMCA (Score:2, Interesting)
by epcraig
(102626) on Monday March 29, @08:29AM (#8701981)
|
| USA-PATRIOT, war on Iraq, DMCA is just my longest standing
grudge against the Demoblicans and Republicrats...
After all, only a conspiracy theorist would point to Skull
and Bones. ;-)
|
Re:DMCA (Score:2) by That's
Unpossible! (722232) * on
Monday March 29, @09:50AM (#8702359)
|
If you want real freedom, vote Libertarian.
But
with freedom comes responsibility. This land of children
living off the nanny state cannot handle that, I am sad to
say. |
Re:DMCA (Score:2, Funny) by
OMEGA Power
(651936) on Monday March 29, @03:19PM (#8706278)
(Last Journal: http://slashdot.org/~OMEGA%20Power/journal/)
|
Vote for Nader, Get Bush!
Much as I dislike
Kerry's positions on a number of issues (including the DMCA
and Globalization) he is far, far, far better than Bush. Since
Nader has no chance in hell of being elected it is important
to vote for Kerry (even if you don't like everything he says)
in order to keep Bush from winning.
In 2000 a lot of
people (myself included) voted for Nader because they opposed
Gore's right-of-center positions on many issues and the result
has been record deficits, prepetual war, general outrage from
the international comunity and the gradual roll back of our
civil liberties and constiutional rights.
Recent polls
predict that Nader will get far less than the number of votes
needed to get federal matching funds for the Green Party and
that "his 2004 candidacy a much greater threat to the
Democratic Party's candidate than to George W. Bush" (Source:
The Gallup Organization [gallup.com], Summary,
subscription required to view full article.) So don't kid
yourself a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush and the last
thing we (the people of the US) need is four more years of
King George II.
ReDefeat Bush in 2004! Vote
John Kerry for President [johnkerry.com] |
Re:DMCA (Score:2, Insightful)
by comedian23 (730042)
on Monday March 29, @07:22PM (#8708917)
|
Your post is the reason our democracy doesn't work. If you
vote for Nader enough and the Democrats loose enough times
they will finally catch on and attempt to realign themselves
with their alienated voters. But if you vote for them they are
going to keep putting up degenerates like Kerry over and over
again. And they are going to assume you like his politics
since you voted for him.
Take a long view on
this, not a short view. Your vote is the only thing that
matters to your party. Don't give it to them if they don't
give you something you want(like a candidate worth voting
for).
Of course, I don't think the majority of Dem's
want Kerry to win anyway. He strikes me as a candidate set up
to fail miserably, to allow for a Hillary run in '08, but that
is just my opinion.
-Comedian |
Take me to your lizard. (Score:2)
by I am
Jack's username (528712) on Tuesday March 30, @05:52AM (#8712270)
(http://jack.p5.org.uk/index.en.html)
|
| > So don't kid yourself a vote for Nader is a vote
for Bush and the last thing we (the people of the US) need is
four more years of King George II. -- OMEGA Power (651936)
Douglas Adams, writing in "So long, and thanks for all the
fish", chapter 36:
"It comes from a very ancient democracy, you
see..." "You mean, it comes from a world of
lizards?" "No", said Ford, who by this time was a little
more rational and coherent than he had been, having finally
had the coffee forced down him, "nothing so simple. Nothing
anything like so straightforward. On its world, the people
are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the
lizards and the lizards rule the people." "Odd", said
Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy." "I did",
said Ford. "It is." |